NEWS28 October 2002: MORE PROOF OF ANCIENT BRITONS IN USA!! - please see What's New section.
24 September 2002: Evidence which is NOT admissable evidence - please see What's New section.
9 September 2002: The Ancient British Alphabet - An Introduction - An e-mail from Dr. Roderick Schmidt hitbtc of the Equinox Project encouraged us to provide a basic introduction to the ancient British alphabet, sometimes referred to as "Coelbren". (Coelbren is a village in South Wales, incidentally.) This is an important subject and we print Dr. Schmidt's somewhat misleading letter in full, with a detailed response from Alan Wilson.
26 August 2002: PRESS RELEASE: BRITONS IN USA IN 6TH CENTURY - SHOCK CLAIM
"It's proof of Prince Madoc in America circa 560," say leading British and US historians.
A team of leading independent historians and researchers announced today that Radio Carbon dating evidence, and the discovery of ancient British style artefacts and inscriptions in the American Midwest, provided, "the strongest indications yet" that British explorers, under the Prince Madoc ap Meurig, arrived in the country during the 6th Century and set up colonies there.
Research team members have known the location of burial sites of Madoc's close relatives in Wales for some time, it emerged today; they have decided to break their self-imposed silence in what is binary options trading order that their research be fully known and understood. DNA evidence could provide vital new leads, they say. Read more...
20 August 2002: Baram Blackett responds to madoc1170.com allegations
On 14th August, Howard Kimberley of the so-called "Madoc International Research Organisation" posted a series of disgraceful lies on the Madoc1170.com discussion board. So blatant and open was his attack that we felt it vital to respond. Read more...
18 August 2002: PRESS RELEASE: LEADING UK HISTORIANS CHALLENGE TO SPIELBERG
UK historians Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett are the world?s leading experts on the real, historical King Arthur ll, King of Glamorgan and Gwent, and are challenging Stephen Spielberg, the internationally acclaimed filmmaker.
"Spielberg is planning a film on King Arthur," said Alan Wilson today. "We have tried to contact him via his Dreamworks company, but, despite our efforts, we understand that his Arthur film will be set in Somerset." Paul Flynn, Labour MP for Newport, brought up this issue in Parliament recently. Flynn argued in the House of Commons that Arthur ll was a Gwent King. "He's spot on," said Wilson this morning. Read more...
Research began in 1956 into neglected politically incorrect records. These detail King Arthur I of the late Fourth Century and King Arthur II of the Sixth Century in prolific detail. Outstanding discoveries have resulted much to the discomfort of the establishment.
Wherever you are on this website, click on the Electrum Cross in the margin to get to the Contents Page
After forty two years of historical research there have been momentous tangible discoveries. As President Harry Truman of the United States once said: "The only new thing in the world, is the History which you do not know."
"King Arthur" was never lost, nor were all the histories lost. They were simply painted over and concealed. The propaganda result of secular politics and religious politics in Britain during the 18th, 19th, and 20th Century, was the total obliteration of almost the entire ancient History of Britain. The ancient Records simply fell into oblivion, because they did not support what was deemed to be "politically correct". For the first time the stale speculations and Victorian anachronisms are appropriately left far behind.
"King Arthur" of the Mediaeval Romances was a composite figure. His feats as in the Eighth century Brut Tysillio, and in the twelfth century Brut Gruffydd ap Arthur - alias "Geoffrey of Monmouth" - illustrate him fighting and defeating the Romans in the Fouth Century AD, and also battling with the Saxons, Angles, and others, in the Sixth Century. As Polydore Vergil the court historian of King Henry VIII pointed out he was an impossible figure of 250 years old.
The discarded and abused Records, which are for political reasons ignored,tell a very different story. They very clearly and firmly accurately illustrate two well known and easily bittrex traceable Kings named Arthur who make up the foreign French, Breton, and German, impossible Romantic figure. It is not possible to "lose" major Kings in British Historical Records. Such claims are nefarious chicanery.
Once we have identified these two Arthurs the task of delving through the multitudious copious detailed records, which officially are not supposed to exist, can begin.The results are extraordinary. As Professor John Morris of London said in his Age of Arthur, "the problem is not one of a shortage of information, instead there is too much information."